FICTIONAL LANDSCAPE · SYNTHETIC VALUES · NO REAL-WORLD ADVICE

SIMULATOR · PUBLIC CONCEPT PROTOTYPE · v0.1.1

A small catchment,
several futures

Change a fictional landscape. Look beyond the first result.

An intervention can change what happens locally, later and downstream. Explore those differences in Wattle Bend, an invented catchment with two deliberately simple toy models.

Every place, value and outcome here is invented. This prototype cannot predict environmental outcomes or support land-management decisions. It demonstrates an interface and its limits.

A FOUR-STEP WALKTHROUGH

Look beyond the first view

Start with a greener creek corridor, move through time, widen the view and reach a deliberate refusal.

Choose a scenario

These broad labels select invented rules. They do not specify a real intervention, its engineering or a real weather sequence.

WATTLE BEND · AN INVENTED PLACE

The visible landscape

Fictional Wattle Bend catchmentA schematic landscape with a creek, a small intervention area and a hidden below-ground section. Use the reveal button to show downstream effects and omitted processes. This is not a map of a real place. SurfaceIntervention footprint Creek corridorSchematic only. No measured distances.

ILLUSTRATIVE CONSEQUENCE ENVELOPE

What travels with the result

TOY COMPARISON ONLY

    Early local change

    Later and further away

    What remains unknown

    Sediment, ecological change, extreme-event behaviour, cumulative interventions and real receptors are not represented. There is no measured baseline, calibration or validation.

    Who may decide

    This page has no authority over real land or Country. Real work would require legitimate local decision processes, permissions and appropriate Traditional Owner governance before data or knowledge is used.

    Compare with no new action

    Invented indices, 0 to 100. Each index has its own arbitrary scale. A higher number has no shared meaning across rows. Differences are toy arithmetic, not measured effects.

    Toy indexSelected action
    Model A
    Selected action
    Model B
    No new action
    Model A
    No new action
    Model B

    No new action is a separate conditional scenario. It is not a claim that a real catchment stays unchanged.

    Two assumptions, different trajectories

    Both models use the same invented rule family and starting values. Model B assigns a stronger connection and a shorter delay to the below-ground pathway. Their agreement would not establish independent evidence. Their differences are not probabilities.

    Illustrative salinity concern across four horizonsToy index trajectories for Models A and B. The full values appear in the table below.

    ━━ Model A ┄┄ Model B

    Read all trajectory values
    Illustrative salinity concern, 0 to 100. Toy values only.
    HorizonModel AModel B

    Inspect the workings

    Trace the toy result

    The current selections and both models' invented intermediate values are shown below. A displayed number does not turn an assumption into an observation.

    What real evidence would be needed?
    • A coherent, dated baseline with provenance, coverage, measurement uncertainty and permissions.
    • Catchment boundaries, downstream receptors and groundwater connections supported by observations.
    • Process models tested for the intended place, timescale and use, with their shared ancestry recorded.
    • Explicit intervention geometry, engineering, maintenance, failure conditions and alternatives.
    • Checks on transformations, conservation and uncertainty when models exchange information.
    • Local authority and appropriate Traditional Owner governance, including what must remain restricted.
    • Monitoring that can challenge the result, plus clear expiry and refusal conditions.

    This list describes work still needed. No evidence has been collected or scientific review completed for this example.

    See the synthetic rule sheet

    The complete deterministic rules are shown below. Every coefficient is invented. The two models share these formulas, so they are related by design. Nothing here is a scientific estimate.

    All results are rounded and clipped to 0 through 100. That clipping is an interface convenience. It is not a physical conservation rule or a validation check.

    Where could your expertise enter?

    Choose an area to see what would need to replace the toy rule. You can prepare an interest note locally, then decide whether and where to share it yourself.

    Nothing is sent by this page. It has no contact form, accounts, analytics, cookies or browser storage. Selections and notes are lost when this tab reloads or closes unless you copy or download them. Your host and browser still handle ordinary page requests.